Key result
Higher iECV is linked to ~15% higher odds of symptomatic functional impairment in MVP.
Why the study?
Mitral valve prolapse causes mitral regurgitation and maladaptive left ventricular remodelling, prompting a comprehensive CMR characterization of LV remodelling markers across MR severity grades and their association with functional status.
Do CMR markers of maladaptive LV remodelling correlate with mitral regurgitation severity and functional status (NYHA class) in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Cross-Sectional (n=132)
No
Do CMR markers of maladaptive LV remodelling correlate with mitral regurgitation severity and functional status (NYHA class) in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
In mitral valve prolapse, CMR markers of maladaptive LV remodelling increase progressively across MR grades, with global native T1, iECV, and EDV/LVM-ratio correlating most strongly with symptom burden (NYHA class ≥II) rather than MR severity alone.
CMR markers may refine symptom assessment beyond MR severity in MVP; leaves open prospective validation before guiding management.
Background Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) causes mitral regurgitation (MR), leading to volume overload and maladaptive left ventricular (LV) remodelling. Objective To comprehensively characterize markers of maladaptive LV remodelling across MR severity grades in MVP using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and their association with functional status. Methods Patients with MVP undergoing 1.5T CMR (2016–2025) were stratified by MR fraction: mild<20%, moderate 20–39%, and severe ≥40%. Exclusion criteria were significant coronary artery disease, rheumatic valve disease, mitral stenosis, previous mitral valve procedures, endocarditis or signs of primary cardiomyopathy. Global native T1, T2, extracellular volume (ECV), indexed ECV (iECV), indexed intracellular volume (iICV), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were quantified. Indexed LV end-diastolic volume (EDVI) and the EDV-to-LV mass ratio (EDV/LVM-ratio) were also calculated as indices of LV remodelling and adaptive hypertrophy. Functional status was assessed by NYHA class. Results Among 112 MVP patients (23 mild, 48 moderate, 41 severe MR) and 20 controls, LGE prevalence (17% vs. 46% vs. 51% vs. 0%) and the proportion with LV dilatation (46% vs. 67% vs. 88% vs 15%) rose progressively with MR severity. Increased EDVI, prevalence of LGE, higher EDV/LVM-ratio, global native T1 and iECV showed the strongest associations with more severe MR, whereas EDV/LVM-ratio, iECV and global native T1 were independently related to NYHA class≥II. Conclusions CMR markers of maladaptive LV remodelling were abnormal across all MR grades and increased markedly with MR severity. Global native T1, iECV and EDV/LVM-ratio correlated most strongly with symptom burden, rather than MR severity per se.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lodin et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve prolapse and degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=132). Mitral regurgitation severity and CMR myocardial remodelling markers (global native T1, iECV, EDV/LVM-ratio) vs. Healthy controls without MVP or MR / asymptomatic status (NYHA class I) was evaluated on Symptomatic functional status (NYHA class >= II) associated with indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (OR 1.15, p=0.04). In mitral valve prolapse, LGE prevalence rose with MR severity (17% to 51%), while native T1 (OR 1.02), iECV (OR 1.15), and EDV/LVM-ratio (OR 0.16) independently predicted NYHA class >=II.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: