Key result
Psychosocial factors shape cardiac rehabilitation adherence, which averages only ~34% globally.
Why the study?
Adherence to cardiac rehabilitation is a primary challenge in organizing secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications, requiring a synthesis of current research to identify psychosocial targets for multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams.
Do psychosocial factors across macrosocial, family, personal, and interpersonal levels influence adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Do psychosocial factors across macrosocial, family, personal, and interpersonal levels influence adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
This narrative review structures heterogeneous data on cardiac rehabilitation adherence using a four-level psychosocial framework, identifying healthcare accessibility, family support, patient mental health (depression/anxiety), and clinician empathy as key modifiable targets for multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams.
May guide psychosocial targeting in cardiac rehabilitation; hypothesis-generating for adherence interventions pending randomized trials.
Background and Relevance. Adherence to cardiac rehabilitation represents a primary challenge in the organization of secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications. Objective. To synthesize current research on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and to identify psychosocial targets for collaborative practice within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Methods. The multifactorial psychosocial model developed by A.B. Kholmogorova and N.G. Garanyan, encompassing macrosocial, family, personal, and interpersonal levels, was utilized as the theoretical and methodological framework for this literature review. Results. At the family level, the regulatory, informational, and emotionally supportive functions of the family were identified as key contributors to adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and its efficacy. At the interpersonal level, the influence of social relationships, including the patient's perception of interactions with healthcare providers, on physical health status and long-term treatment attitudes was highlighted. At the personal level, the impact of depressive and anxiety states on achieving cardiac rehabilitation outcomes and maintaining treatment adherence was established. Conclusion. The application of the multifactorial psychosocial model by A.B. Kholmogorova and N.G. Garanyan enabled the structuring of heterogeneous data regarding cardiac rehabilitation adherence, thereby delineating the role of psychosocial factors and identifying specific targets for future clinical interventions and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A.A. Gerasimova (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases requiring cardiac rehabilitation (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure). Psychosocial factors and multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation interventions vs. Standard care or lack of psychosocial/rehabilitation support was evaluated on Adherence to and efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation. Psychosocial factors across macrosocial, family, personal, and interpersonal levels critically determine cardiac rehabilitation adherence, which averages 34% globally (range 1% to 75%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: