Key result
ARBs are linked to ~14% lower incident dementia risk compared to lisinopril.
Why the study?
Observational studies suggest ARBs are associated with lower dementia risk than ACEIs, but whether dementia risk differs across individual ARBs remained uncertain.
Does initiation of individual or pooled angiotensin receptor blockers reduce the risk of incident all-cause dementia compared with lisinopril or losartan in ACEI/ARB-naive adults aged 55 to 80 years?
Cohort (n=2,051,275)
Yes
Does initiation of individual or pooled angiotensin receptor blockers reduce the risk of incident all-cause dementia compared with lisinopril or losartan in ACEI/ARB-naive adults aged 55 to 80 years?
In this large target-trial emulation, angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with lower dementia risk than lisinopril, with marked within-class heterogeneity where candesartan and irbesartan showed the strongest protection and losartan the least.
ARBs showed heterogeneous associations with lower dementia risk versus lisinopril; leaves open whether specific agents confer benefit warranting randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Observational studies suggest that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are associated with lower dementia risk than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Whether dementia risk differs across individual ARBs remains uncertain and was investigated in this study. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study emulated target trials using electronic health record and claims data from 44 US health care organizations in the TriNetX Linked Research Network. ACEI/ARB-naive adults aged 55 to 80 years initiating an ARB or lisinopril were eligible. Separate 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed for each comparison. Individual and pooled ARBs were compared with lisinopril (between-class), and non-losartan ARBs with losartan (within-class). The primary outcome was incident all-cause dementia; secondary outcomes included Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, death, and dementia or death. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses included lagged and treatment-persistence analyses, control outcomes, and E-values. RESULTS: Of 22,025,599 individuals screened, 2,051,275 were eligible; matched cohorts ranged from 10,113 to 857,773, with median follow-up of 4.7 to 7.2 years. Pooled ARBs were associated with lower dementia risk than lisinopril (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.87), with substantial variation across individual agents (HR range, 0.66 to 0.93). Within-class comparisons showed similar heterogeneity (HR range, 0.68 to 0.94) and reproduced between-class agent ordering by HR estimates. Considerable agent-level variation was also observed across secondary outcomes. Losartan, the most commonly prescribed ARB, had the least favorable dementia associations. Negative-control associations were near null within class, and sensitivity analyses supported robustness. DISCUSSION: Individual ARBs were associated with differing dementia risks, suggesting clinically relevant within-class heterogeneity pending confirmation in randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hampilos et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Dementia (n=2,051,275). Angiotensin receptor blockers (pooled and individual: candesartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, valsartan) vs. Lisinopril (between-class) and Losartan (within-class) was evaluated on Incident all-cause dementia (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.85-0.87). Angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with lower incident dementia risk than lisinopril (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.85-0.87), with substantial heterogeneity across individual agents (HR 0.66-0.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: