Key result
Combined limb HIIT reduces systolic blood pressure by ~15 mmHg vs control in hypertension.
Why the study?
Traditional lower-limb aerobic rehabilitation programs have a limited antihypertensive effect in middle-aged men with arterial hypertension, and involving upper-limb muscles through high-intensity interval training needed experimental substantiation.
Does a 24-week combined upper and lower limb high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program reduce blood pressure and improve maximal oxygen uptake compared to isolated limb training or standard lifestyle recommendations in middle-aged men with stage 1 arterial hypertension?
RCT (n=75)
4-arm parallel randomization
No
Does a 24-week combined upper and lower limb high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program reduce blood pressure and improve maximal oxygen uptake compared to isolated limb training or standard lifestyle recommendations in middle-aged men with stage 1 arterial hypertension?
Combining upper and lower limb muscles in a 24-week high-intensity interval training program produces a synergistic antihypertensive effect (16.4 mmHg SBP reduction) and improves whole-body cardiorespiratory fitness more effectively than isolated limb training in untreated middle-aged men with stage 1 hypertension.
Supports combined upper-lower limb HIIT for stage 1 hypertension management; extends lower-limb aerobic training evidence.
Introduction: Arterial hypertension remains a leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and mortality, particularly among middle-aged men. Traditional rehabilitation programs based on aerobic exercise for the lower limbs demonstrate a limited antihypertensive effect. The involvement of upper limb muscles, which possess a high adaptive potential, may enhance training effectiveness. Objective: To develop and experimentally substantiate a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program for upper and lower limb muscles in the physical rehabilitation of men aged 35–60 years with stage 1 arterial hypertension. Materials and methods: The study included 75 men who were randomized into four groups: upper limb training, lower limb training, combined upper and lower limb training, and a control group. The training program lasted 24 weeks with a frequency of three sessions per week at an intensity of 90% of maximal oxygen uptake power. Ergospirometric parameters and blood pressure levels were assessed before and after the intervention. Results: The greatest increase in maximal oxygen uptake during lower limb testing was observed in the lower limb and combined training groups, while during upper limb testing it was observed in the upper limb and combined training groups. The combined training group demonstrated the greatest reduction in systolic blood pressure (16.4±10.0 mmHg; p<0.001; d=–1.64), significantly exceeding the results of isolated training and control groups. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly only in the combined training and lower limb training groups. Conclusion: A combined high-intensity interval training program involving both upper and lower limb muscles is a highly effective non-pharmacological intervention for arterial hypertension. It provides a synergistic antihypertensive effect and a significant improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness, supporting its use to reduce cardiovascular risk in middle-aged men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meshtel et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Stage 1 arterial hypertension or prehypertension (n=75). Combined upper and lower limb high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Standard lifestyle modification control (or isolated upper/lower limb HIIT) was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 24 weeks (MD -14.8 mmHg, 95% CI -22.5 to -7.0, p=≤0.001). Combined upper and lower limb HIIT reduced systolic blood pressure by 16.4 mmHg over 24 weeks (MD -14.8 mmHg vs control, p≤0.001) in men with stage 1 hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: