Key result
Clinically stable patients 0.5–6 years post-MI had high rates of physical inactivity (86.4% <150 min/week), overweight/obesity (78.6%), hypertension (65.7%), and anxiety (37.9%) at baseline.
Why the study?
Clinically stable patients in the long-term post-myocardial infarction period may exhibit physical inactivity, unmanaged cardiovascular risk factors, and psychoemotional or behavioural challenges. Comprehensive evaluation of these characteristics is needed to identify rehabilitation needs and individualise home-based physical therapy.
RCT (n=140)
Randomized
Clinically stable patients 0.5 to 6 years post-myocardial infarction exhibit high rates of physical inactivity, unmanaged cardiovascular risk factors, and psychoemotional barriers, underscoring the necessity of comprehensive baseline assessments to individualize long-term home-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Relevance. In the long-term rehabilitation period following myocardial infarction, clinically stable patients may exhibit insufficient physical activity levels, unmanaged modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, as well as psychoemotional and behavioural challenges. Comprehensive evaluation of these characteristics is essential to identify rehabilitation needs and individualise home-based physical therapy. Aim. To evaluate baseline clinical, functional, behavioural, and psychoemotional characteristics, alongside health-related quality of life, in patients post-myocardial infarction, and to determine the rehabilitation needs required for individualising home-based physical therapy. Materials and methods. Baseline data from 140 clinically stable patients enrolled in a randomised controlled trial evaluating a tailored home-based physical therapy programme were analysed. The post-myocardial infarction duration ranged from 0.5 to 6 years. Clinical and demographic characteristics, functional capacity, physical activity levels, symptoms of anxiety and depression, kinesiophobia, exercise self-efficacy, and quality of life were assessed. Results. The median time elapsed since myocardial infarction was 2.0 [1.0; 3.25] years. Overweight or obesity was present in 78.6% of patients, arterial hypertension in 65.7%, and diabetes mellitus in 14.3%; 18.6% of patients continued to smoke. The mean 6-minute walk test distance was 523.1 ± 58.3 m; however, 86.4% of patients failed to achieve the recommended physical activity target of ≥150 minutes/week. Clinically significant symptoms of anxiety were identified in 37.9% of patients, and depressive symptoms in 30.7%. The mean kinesiophobia score was 28.7 ± 4.4 points, exercise self-efficacy was 23.9 ± 5.6 points, and the overall quality of life score was 1.86 ± 0.26 points. The control and intervention groups were overall comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Conclusions. The baseline profile of patients 0.5 to 6 years post-myocardial infarction was characterised by a combination of physical inactivity, excess body weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and psychoemotional and behavioural barriers. The most prevalent rehabilitation needs included increasing daily physical activity, managing modifiable risk factors, and overcoming psychoemotional and behavioural obstacles. These findings highlight the value of a comprehensive baseline assessment as the foundation for individualising long-term home-based physical therapy following myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savchuk et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Post-myocardial infarction (long-term rehabilitation period) (n=140). Tailored home-based physical therapy programme vs. Control group was evaluated on Baseline clinical, functional, behavioural, and psychoemotional characteristics (including failure to achieve physical activity target ≥150 minutes/week). Clinically stable patients 0.5–6 years post-MI had high rates of physical inactivity (86.4% <150 min/week), overweight/obesity (78.6%), hypertension (65.7%), and anxiety (37.9%) at baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: