Why the study?
Most machine learning methods for ECG analysis lack interpretability and require manual abnormal region annotations, limiting their clinical adoption.
Does the IECG foundation model with clinically guided attention supervision improve abnormality localization and diagnostic classification on 12-lead ECGs compared to existing foundation models and explainability methods?
Does the IECG foundation model with clinically guided attention supervision improve abnormality localization and diagnostic classification on 12-lead ECGs compared to existing foundation models and explainability methods?
Incorporating clinical diagnostic heuristics via weak supervision enables an ECG foundation model to achieve state-of-the-art waveform abnormality localization (75.55% AUROCloc) without manual region annotations while maintaining strong diagnostic classification accuracy.
Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cornerstone of cardiac diagnosis, yet most machine learning methods for ECG analysis lack interpretability, limiting their clinical adoption. We present IECG, a weakly-supervised ECG foundation model that jointly performs diagnostic classification and abnormality localization without requiring manual abnormal region annotations, overcoming a long-standing bottleneck in interpretable ECG learning. Central to IECG is a weakly-supervised attention strategy that explicitly incorporates clinical priors by deriving abnormality heatmap pseudo-labels from established ECG clinical knowledge. These pseudo-labels guide the model's CLS-token attention through a KL-divergence loss, encouraging it to focus on diagnostically relevant waveform regions. During pretraining, IECG is jointly optimized with clinically guided attention supervision, ECG-text contrastive alignment, and report captioning objectives, enabling it to learn rich multimodal representations while producing localized waveform evidence. By explicitly aggregating features from clinically guided attention regions, IECG grounds its diagnostic predictions in interpretable waveform evidence without sacrificing classification performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IECG achieves state-of-the-art abnormal region localization while maintaining strong classification performance, advancing trustworthy foundation models for ECG analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied Cardiac abnormalities on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (n=178,869). IECG (Weakly-Supervised Interpretability-Enhancing Foundation Model for Electrocardiogram) vs. Baseline ECG foundation and attribution models (including ECGADmodel, TolerantECG, MERL, METS, ECG-FM, ST-MEM, HeartLang, XAI4ECG, and ECG-XPLAIM) was evaluated on ECG abnormality localization (point-level AUROC on ECGAD dataset).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: