Key result
Higher monthly income links to ~45% higher odds of concurrent hypertension and diabetes screening positivity.
Why the study?
Hypertension and diabetes frequently coexist and increase cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality, but evidence on their coexistence and socioeconomic, lifestyle, and dietary correlates in Southwestern Nigeria remains limited.
Cross-Sectional (n=244)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concurrent hypertension and diabetes affects 7.2% of screened community adults (14.8% of those screening positive for either condition) in Southwestern Nigeria, with a positive exploratory association with higher income that did not survive multiple-testing correction, highlighting the need for integrated community screening.
Background Hypertension and diabetes frequently coexist, increasing cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. Evidence on the coexistence of these conditions and their socioeconomic, lifestyle, and dietary correlates in Southwestern Nigeria remains limited. This study aimed to assess the burden of concurrent hypertension and diabetes and determine the socioeconomic, lifestyle, and dietary factors associated with their coexistence among adults in selected communities in Southwestern Nigeria. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among adults in selected urban and peri-urban communities in Southwestern Nigeria between July and December 2025. Using a two-stage probability-sampling approach, 500 adults were screened for hypertension and diabetes. All 244 participants who screened positive for at least one condition underwent detailed sociodemographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and dietary assessment. Dietary patterns were derived using principal component analysis. Associations with concurrent hypertension-diabetes screening positivity were evaluated using Firth bias-reduced logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate correction across 11 exposure tests. Results Among the 244 screen-positive participants, 14.8% had both conditions. Three dietary patterns, plant-rich traditional, beverage-animal foods, and grain-condiment/snack, explained 39.0% of dietary variation. Higher monthly income showed the strongest adjusted association with concurrent screening positivity (aOR per income-category increase 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–1.98; p = 0.023), but this association did not remain statistically significant after false-discovery-rate correction (q = 0.251). No measured lifestyle or dietary-pattern exposure remained significant after correction. Sensitivity analyses using more specific outcome definitions showed a similar positive income gradient. Conclusion Concurrent hypertension and diabetes represents a meaningful cardiometabolic burden among adults in these Southwestern Nigerian communities. Although higher income showed a consistent positive association across analyses, the finding remains exploratory because it did not withstand multiple-testing correction. Integrated screening and larger prospective studies using confirmatory measurements are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adeyemi-Benson et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Concurrent hypertension and diabetes mellitus (n=244). Higher monthly income (per income-category increase) vs. Lower monthly income category was evaluated on Concurrent hypertension and diabetes screening positivity (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-1.98, p=0.023 (FDR q=0.251)). Higher monthly income was associated with concurrent hypertension-diabetes screening positivity (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–1.98; p=0.023), but did not remain significant after FDR correction (q=0.251).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: