Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to propose a clinical decision-making tool for predicting mortality in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery with a palliative intent in the oncology setting. METHODS: Identification of all emergency surgical procedures performed in a Department of Oncologic Surgery in a Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2008 and January 2013. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify factors predicitve of mortality at 3 months and survival probabilities. Models were internally validated using bootstrapping and calibration. RESULTS: The mortality rates were 30% at 1 month, 46.7% at 3 months and 83.3% at the end of the study. One model based on the albumin level and the P-POSSUM score (AUC: 0.725) adequately predicted mortality at 3 months. A survival nomogram predicted mortality with a concordance index (CI) of 0.718, using the following factors: WHO performance status (P = 0.02), albumin level (P < 0.01) and P-POSSUM score (P < 0.01). The origin or the extent of the carcinoma did not own sufficient pronostic impact to be selected in this model. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative mortality risk scores can be developed in a palliative context. Physicians counselling and surgical decision making should be based on the use of these tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumont et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: