The Energy Internet extends the classical power grid into a densely interconnected system of distributed energy resources, advanced metering infrastructure, and machine-learning-driven control loops, and this extension enlarges the attack surface at the same rate that it improves efficiency. Perimeter-based security models, which implicitly trust any device or control message that has already crossed the substation firewall, are a poor match for this environment because a compromised remote terminal unit or a spoofed measurement stream sits, by construction, inside the perimeter. This paper develops a zero-trust cybersecurity framework for AI-driven Energy Internet and smart grid systems that treats every measurement, device, and control action as unverified until it is continuously re-evaluated. The framework combines four elements: a continuous trust-score recursion with an evidence-driven decay dynamic; an artificial-intelligence risk engine that fuses residual-based anomaly scores with a federated-learning classifier trained across substations without centralising raw telemetry; a tiered false-data-injection detector that partitions the network into observability zones and exploits tie-line flow measurements the attacker does not control, building on and extending an existing tiered detection and distributed partitioning method; and a policy decision engine, formalised as a Stackelberg game between defender and attacker, that converts trust and risk scores into access decisions. The framework is evaluated through reproducible simulations on the IEEE 14-, 30-, and 118-bus test systems, using a from-scratch alternating-current weighted least squares state estimator, physically grounded false-data-injection attacks restricted to a realistic compromised-measurement subset, and extensive Monte Carlo campaigns on each system. The results show a sharp, theoretically predicted transition in detectability governed by the ratio between the number of measurements an attacker controls and the redundancy of the measurement set; a consistent detection advantage for the tiered partitioned detector precisely in the narrow operating region attackers would rationally target; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.98 for the combined detector across all three test systems; sub-second state-estimation solve times even on the 118-bus system; and a trust-score policy engine whose false-revocation rate and detection delay trade off predictably with the memory parameter of the trust recursion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mumbaikar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: