Channel estimation in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) systems remains a critical challenge in fifth-generation (5G) and sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks, particularly under adversarial perturbations that can severely degrade the reliability of deep-learning-based estimators. Conventional normalisation techniques, notably Batch Normalization (BN), exhibit well-documented instability under small or variable batch sizes and limited robustness to adversarial inputs, thereby restricting their suitability for security-sensitive edge deployment scenarios. This paper proposes GNConvNet, a compact fully-convolutional channel estimator in which BN is replaced by Group Normalization (GN), and which is trained within a teacher–student defensive distillation framework that combines a Kullback–Leibler distillation loss, a clean-data mean-squared-error (MSE) loss, and an adversarial-MSE term computed on Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) perturbations. The model is evaluated on the standard MATLAB 5G Toolbox dataset (512 channel realisations under TDL-A through TDL-E profiles with SNR 0–10 dB) in a SISO downlink OFDM configuration, matching the foundational study by Catak et al., against four white-box attacks (FGSM, BIM, MIM, PGD) at perturbation budgets ε ∈ {0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0}. To eliminate hyperparameter-selection leakage, the 32-sample MATLAB validation set is deterministically partitioned into a 16-sample development-validation subset (for hyperparameter tuning) and a 16-sample held-out test subset (for final reported results). A six-point batch-size sweep over B ∈ {2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64} confirms that GN outperforms BN at every small-batch setting, with the largest gap (60%) at B = 16. A four-way ablation on the held-out test set isolates the contributions of GN (9.1% MSE reduction) and Distillation (7.0%), with the combined GNConvNet achieving a 13.1% total mean-MSE reduction and a 9 × reduction in inter-seed variance relative to the BN baseline. Across 15 matched-seed trials, GNConvNet reaches a mean test MSE of 0.021534 ± 0.000305 versus 0.025571 ± 0.003024 for BN (Welch’s t = − 7.34, p = 1.07 × 10 −6 ; Wilcoxon p = 6.10 × 10 − 5; Cohen’s d = 2.68; GN wins 15 of 15 trials). Under adversarial attack at ε = 3.0, GNConvNet achieves 5–58 × lower malicious MSE than the BN baseline across all four attack families. The proposed model is compact (92,641 trainable parameters, 16 ms single-sample CPU inference) and therefore well-suited to real-time edge deployment in next-generation base stations. The complete reproduction notebook implementing the deterministic split and all experiments is publicly released.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: