Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study comprehensively investigates the machinability performance of dry cutting, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), and nanoparticle-modified minimum quantity lubrication (nano-MQL) methods in turning AA7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Tool wear mechanisms were evaluated using SEM/EDS analyses; surface roughness, cutting forces, and energy consumption were compared under different cutting parameters. In addition, the obtained data were predicted and evaluated using machine learning-based correlation maps and random forest models. The results demonstrated that the cutting environment plays a decisive role in machining performance. The nano-MQL application reduced the build-up edge (BUE) height at the cutting edge by approximately 29% compared to dry cutting and presented a more stable wear morphology compared to MQL. Surface roughness values were measured at their lowest levels under nano-MQL conditions for all cutting parameters; an improvement of 12–20% compared to dry cutting and 3–10% compared to MQL was achieved. The cutting forces were reduced by an average of 8–19% in the nano-MQL environment compared to dry cutting, while energy consumption savings ranged from 10–53%. The nano-MQL strategy demonstrated high performance and energy efficiency in turning AA7075-T6 alloy by reducing tool wear, improving surface quality, and lowering cutting forces and energy consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: