Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post-conflict urban rehabilitation requires the repair of devastated physical infrastructure as well as the re-establishment of social functions, environmental systems and urban identity. This paper uses Aghdam, situated in the Karabakh economic region of southwestern Azerbaijan, as a case study of sustainability-driven urban development in near-tabula rasa conditions. This study applies an embedded mixed-methods case-study design combining document and policy analysis, spatial interpretation, site-based observations, and an exploratory stakeholder survey comprising 65 valid responses. The analysis is structured into five dimensions: master planning, energy-efficient urban design, green infrastructure and environmental sustainability, social sustainability and cultural identity and urban memory preservation. The findings suggest that Aghdam is being constructed not only as a site for physical reconstruction but also as a new urban paradigm in which spatial organization, infrastructure, environmental stewardship, social reintegration, and memorial sites are seen as interconnected elements of recovery. The Aghdam case illustrates that the long-term sustainability of cities in post-conflict settings depends not only on the physical reconstruction of the city, but also on the regeneration of the functional, social and symbolic foundations of urban life. This paper provides a case-based paradigm for understanding the operationalization of sustainability in post-conflict urban development, providing transferable insights for other cities facing extensive destruction and looking forward to recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashad Rauf Mahmudov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: