Traditional machine learning (ML) in medical diagnostics often suffers from limited clinical interpretability and poor generalization, owing to its black-box, data-driven nature. Here, we present Prior-Informed Machine Learning (PIML), a framework that integrates clinically grounded generative reasoning with data-driven, ML-enabled discriminative modeling through Bayesian inference to provide clinically interpretable, patient-specific diagnostic outcomes. By embedding the optimization of sensitivity and specificity in data-driven diagnosis—requirements for subsequent Bayesian inference—directly into the ML model development process, PIML enables a synergistic integration of machine learning and clinical expertise that cannot be achieved through either data-driven or clinically grounded approaches alone. PIML was validated across three clinical domains—cervical neoplasia detection, high-risk oral lesion detection, and preterm birth detection—where Bayesian inference was systematically employed to integrate electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)-based machine learning with domain-specific clinical expertise, thereby enabling more comprehensive and enhanced diagnostic decision-making. Our results demonstrate that PIML generally improves diagnostic performance compared with standard ML approaches and provides competitive or superior performance relative to knowledge-based and feature-level prior integration strategies. This work presents an innovative, systematic framework with strong potential for widespread adoption in addressing medical diagnostic challenges across heterogeneous clinical environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: