Background/Objectives: The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is a sensitive marker of central obesity. This study examined the longitudinal trajectory of WHtR in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) initiating sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor therapy within a structured, physician-supported multidisciplinary care model. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study included 140 adults with T2DM initiating SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy, followed at a diabetes outpatient clinic by a physician, diabetes nurse, and dietitian. Anthropometric and bioimpedance measurements, physical activity, and dietary adherence were assessed at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Longitudinal changes were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests, and linear mixed-effects models assessed factors associated with WHtR over time. Results: Mean age was 54.08 ± 11.40 years, and 49.3% of participants were female. WHtR decreased from 0.665 ± 0.101 at baseline to 0.635 ± 0.096 at month 3 and 0.629 ± 0.096 at month 6 (p < 0.001). Body weight (87.68 ± 18.68 to 84.18 ± 17.01 kg), BMI, and waist, hip, and neck circumferences all decreased significantly (p < 0.001), while physical activity and Mediterranean diet adherence increased (p < 0.001). In the mixed-effects model, WHtR remained significantly lower at month 3 (β = −0.029) and month 6 (β = −0.035) than at baseline (both p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Female sex was associated with a higher WHtR level (β = 0.095, p < 0.001), whereas the reduction in WHtR did not differ by sex (p = 0.167). Conclusions: Initiating SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy within a structured multidisciplinary diabetes care model was associated with a significant reduction in central adiposity over six months, most notably reflected by WHtR. These findings support WHtR as a simple tool for monitoring treatment response in patients with T2DM; as mean WHtR remained above 0.5, it may also help identify patients requiring further intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: