Newly planned cities commenced with coherent urban and architectural visions, however, this clarity was often eroded over the twentieth century through shifting planning ideologies and neoliberal development. Australia’s national capital is a case in point. Drawing on literature and archival research, this article examines two generations of post-World War II international discourse that reshaped Canberra. Focusing on the National Capital Development Commission (NCDC) between 1958 and 1988, it traces a transition from a late-modern picturesque approach to civic design, toward a neo-avant-garde conception of civitas. The NCDC directly imported talent from a first generation of Liverpool School graduates emphasising the city as a visual composition. By the mid-1960s, however, NCDC publications, projects, and unrealised schemes reflected a second generation aligned with Team 10 discourse and the work of Alison and Peter Smithson, led locally by Gordon Stephenson and Roger Johnson. This shift redefined urbanism through social association, pedestrian environments, recreation, and the cultivation of an urban commons. We argue that civitas, understood as the shared condition of citizenship, became a lens for reconceptualising Canberra’s centre and suburbs. However, it never came to fruition: the NCDC’s holistic planning ideologies gave way to fragmented development, leaving Canberra’s centre as an unfinished civic project.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farrah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: