Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Balance impairment and reduced functional mobility are common consequences of stroke and can limit independence in activities of daily living. Conventional physiotherapy plays an important role in stroke rehabilitation; however, incorporating specific balance-training strategies may further improve postural control and mobility. Taskoriented balance training focuses on practising functional activities, whereas perturbation-based balance training aims to improve postural responses to balance disturbances. Comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness when combined with conventional physiotherapy remains an important area of investigation. Objective: To compare the effects of Task-Oriented Balance Training and Perturbation-Based Balance Training, when combined with conventional physiotherapy, in improving balance and functional mobility among stroke patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 30 subacute stroke patients aged 40–70 years. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (TOBT + conventional physiotherapy) and Group B (PBBT + conventional physiotherapy), with 15 patients in each group. Both groups received intervention for 4 weeks, three sessions per week. Outcome measures included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Barthel Index (BI), assessed before and after the intervention period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhuri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: