Cross-elbow stent placement in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) has been avoided due to risks of fracture, kinking, deformation, migration, and infection. However, elbow lesions may be refractory to angioplasty and progress to chronic total occlusion (CTO). We evaluated the safety, feasibility, and patency of cross-elbow stenting for AVF salvage. Consecutive adult hemodialysis patients who received cross-elbow stents for clinically significant AVF stenosis or CTO (September 2021 - March 2026) at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were target lesion primary patency (TLPP), access circuit primary patency (ACPP), access circuit secondary patency, and access circuit assisted primary patency, estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Technical and clinical success and complications were recorded. Forty-two patients were included; 45.2% had CTO and 57.1% had prior PTA. Eluvia-based stents were used in 83.3%. Technical and clinical success were both 100%. Mean access flow increased from 407 ± 267 to 839 ± 188 mL/min. TLPP at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 90.1%, 84.4%, 76.9%, and 76.9%, respectively. No stent fracture, migration, kinking, or infection occurred. Cross-elbow stenting was technically feasible and provided favorable short- to mid-term patency without device-related complications, supporting its use as a salvage option for selected refractory AVF lesions and CTOs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: