The masks used in Romanian winter carnivals are becoming increasingly larger, more imposing, and more colourful. This evolution is driven by two key factors: the growing emphasis on visual aesthetic appeal and the need for masks to generate a powerful sensory impact that engages resonates with broader and more diverse audiences. These changes extend beyond the masks themselves to encompass the overall performance, incorporating larger groups of participants and soundscapes, thereby intensifying the sensory experience. As part of this transformation, elements borrowed from various sources are deliberately reworked and exaggerated to heighten the impression of archaism, reinforcing the image of a genuine folk tradition whose apparent preservation of older forms is itself partly achieved through their reinvention. These developments highlight the adaptive nature of ritual practices, where sensory and aesthetic elements play a crucial role in maintaining cultural relevance and sustaining ensuring the ritual’s efficacy. By employing these strategies, such winter masquerades express and reinforce collective identities, power relations, and shared meanings within the community. By enhancing their sensory impact, masquerades not only appeal to contemporary sensibilities but also foster a sense of continuity, grounding the community in its cultural heritage. Thus, ritual elements such as masks function not only as aesthetic artifacts but also as active agents in shaping and conveying identity, power, and collective meaning through evolving sensory strategies. By examining the case of Uncheși (lit. “uncles”) masks of Păunești village in Vrancea County, this article explores how recent transformations of the masks and their performance reflect broader socio-cultural shifts, emphasizing the central role of sensory impact in preserving the ritual’s efficacy and resonance in contemporary contexts. At the same time, it highlights the dialectical relationship between modern innovation and revival of tradition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adelina Dogaru Alexa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: