Key result
Reproductive, endocrine, and psychosocial factors shape women's cardiovascular risk across the life course.
Why the study?
Although conventional risk factors account for much of the CVD burden in women, reproductive, endocrine, obstetric, and psychosocial histories may provide additional clinical context, and the magnitude and independence of their associations with cardiovascular outcomes vary.
This narrative review proposes a conceptual Female Cardiovascular Life-Course Model integrating reproductive, endocrine, obstetric, and psychosocial histories to complement established cardiovascular risk assessment in women.
May inform CV risk assessment in women; leaves open whether life-course models add value pending prospective validation.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Although conventional cardiovascular risk factors account for much of this burden, reproductive, endocrine, obstetric, and psychosocial histories may provide additional clinical context. Evidence from observational studies links several conditions—including polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility, pregnancy loss, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and premature menopause—with subsequent cardiovascular or cardiometabolic outcomes, although the magnitude and independence of these associations vary. Assisted reproductive technologies and psychosocial adversity warrant consideration in relation to underlying conditions and social context rather than being treated uniformly as female-specific risk factors. Potential mechanisms include metabolic dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation, but a single shared causal pathway has not been established. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and proposes a Female Cardiovascular Life-Course Model as a conceptual framework for considering relevant clinical histories at different stages of life. Such information may complement established cardiovascular risk assessment and guideline-based prevention; however, the incremental predictive value and clinical utility of the proposed framework have not been prospectively validated. Further longitudinal research is needed to determine whether incorporating these histories improves risk prediction or cardiovascular outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vizioli et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease in women. Female Cardiovascular Life-Course Model (reproductive, endocrine, obstetric, and psychosocial risk enhancers) was evaluated on Cardiovascular or cardiometabolic outcomes. Reproductive, endocrine, obstetric, and psychosocial histories are linked to cardiovascular outcomes in women, prompting a proposed Female Cardiovascular Life-Course Model for risk assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: