Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The kissing number τ5 is the largest number of non-overlapping unit balls in R^5 that can touch a common unit ball. The best bounds so far were 40 ≤ τ5 ≤ 44; the upper bound comes from a high-precision floating-point computation of the three-point bound by Mittelmann and Vallentin. We prove τ5 ≤ 43. The proof is an exact rational solution of the second level of the Lasserre hierarchy for spherical codes at degrees (d1, d2, δ) = (14, 20, 20). We use the formulation of de Laat, Leijenhorst and de Muinck Keizer and check the solution with their verification program. The certificate is obtained by rounding a convex combination of two dual iterates of the interior-point method, one on each side of the target value. Exact certificates for the same hierarchy also give A(4, arccos 1/3) ≤ 14, A(5, arccos 1/3) ≤ 22 and A(6, arccos 1/3) ≤ 34 for spherical codes, improving the previous bounds 15, 23 and 35; with a known code, A(4, arccos 1/3) = 14. The largest number of points at angle π/3 from a point of a kissing configuration in R^n equals A(n-1, arccos 1/3), so in R^5 this number is 14. We also prove the four bounds in the Lean proof assistant, assuming only the positivity of the zonal kernels given by the zonal polynomial files: once by checking the exact certificates with compiled code, and once, with every computation done by Lean's kernel, from the certificates rounded to 30 decimal places.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tejasvi Singh Tomar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: