Accurate cell-type annotation in single-cell RNA sequencing is sensitive to upstream parameters often selected heuristically. We introduce scBOA, a two-stage framework that uses Bayesian optimization to select workflow parameters against a prespecified objective and reruns the selected configuration for reference-assisted analysis. Its configurable objectives combine annotation purity, marker concordance and transcriptomic cohesion, enabling fine-grained or conservative solutions. Optional extensions support low-confidence-cell refinement and multi-sample integration. Across simulations and fluorescence-activated cell sorting datasets of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, pancreas and adult heart, we compare Gaussian-process scBOA with 14 alternative parameter-selection and clustering strategies. We show that performance depends on the objective, workflow, reference hierarchy and vocabulary, consensus-label construction and partition granularity. We find that scBOA is not uniformly superior, but shows strong aggregate performance when annotation targets align with biological structure. We apply a mouse Huntington’s disease dataset as an exploratory stress test of integration and reference mapping. Overall, we demonstrate that scBOA provides reproducible, objective-driven workflow optimization for reference-assisted single-cell analysis. Here, the authors introduce scBOA, a Bayesian optimization tool that helps researchers choose single-cell analysis settings for cell-type annotation. They perform benchmarking to show that performance depends on the dataset, reference and objective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: