Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Type-II sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) for the multiple measurement vector model recovers a sparse signal power vector by minimizing the marginal negative log-likelihood via the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, referred to as M-SBL. We revisit the covariance learning (CL) problem and develop three parallel first-order algorithms within the successive convex approximation (SCA) framework. CL-SCA minimizes per-coordinate surrogates formed by partially linearizing the log-determinant term, while CL-FP uses a damped projected fixed-point iteration derived from stationarity conditions. Both methods have closed-form updates. We prove that the fixed points of both update maps are exactly the KKT points of the CL problem, that each update direction satisfies a quantitative descent inequality, that the damped iterates achieve sufficient decrease with an O(T-1/2) best-iterate stationarity rate, and we derive a backtracking rule that retains this rate without step-size tuning. If damping factors are bounded away from zero, the residual vanishes along the whole sequence and every limit point is a KKT point. Local analysis motivates CL-Hyb, which combines CL-SCA and CL-FP. Experiments on device activity detection in massive random access show that CL-Hyb-bt matches the best CL solvers' accuracy at a fraction of the runtime and is over an order of magnitude faster than EM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ollila et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: