BACKGROUND: Disasters can have important consequences for health, yet much evidence is cross-sectional and cannot account for time-invariant individual heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE(S): To examine the association between reported disaster exposure and women's mental health, psychological distress, and general health using longitudinal Australian data. METHODS: Data from women aged ≥ 15 years participating in Waves 9-22 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey were analysed. Individual and survey-wave fixed-effects models examined within-person associations between disaster exposure and mental health (MHI-5), psychological distress (Kessler-10), and SF-36 General Health. Sensitivity analyses considered long-term illness and single exposure. Dynamic associations were examined using the Callaway-Sant'Anna multiple-period difference-in-differences estimator with formal pre-trend tests. RESULTS: Reported disaster exposure was associated with modest declines in mental health (β = -0.86, 95% CI - 1.51 to -0.20) and general health (β = -0.83, 95% CI - 1.44 to -0.22). Psychological distress was higher but not statistically significant in the primary model (β = 0.33, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.70). Sensitivity analyses generally supported the mental and general health findings. Event-study analyses showed no consistent evidence of persistent post-exposure deterioration; however, the MHI-5 joint pre-trend test indicated differential pre-exposure patterns, limiting causal interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Reported disaster exposure was associated with modest within-person declines in women's mental and general health, while evidence for psychological distress was less conclusive. The findings support consideration of women's health in disaster preparedness and recovery planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seema et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: