Disease-modifying interventions do not just treat the symptoms of the disease but target the underlying disease process and natural course. The construct of disease-modifying treatments has transformed the care of disorders, like rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, by shifting the focus to preventing end-organ damage rather than offering symptomatic treatment. As mental illness may have a chronic and progressive course, there is a need to consider whether any of our interventions may be disease-modifying. We, therefore, conducted a search using databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO, to identify peer-reviewed papers and grey literature related to the research question: 'Which psychiatric treatments are disease-modifying?' Disease-modifying properties were largely operationalised around end-organ changes, including structural brain changes evident on neuroimaging and cognition, and were reported for conventional psychotropics, as well as for novel pharmaceuticals and non-pharmacological interventions. Lithium and electroconvulsive therapy showed the greatest evidence as disease-modifying interventions. However, to establish this and identify potential other disease-modifying treatments, there needs to be a shift in the focus of psychiatric clinical trials to include primary outcomes that reflect disease progression and not just acute symptom burden. The potential disease-modifying properties of lithium and electroconvulsive therapy should spur the prioritisation of treatment higher up the algorithm, as well as the commencement of disease-modifying therapy as early as possible in the illness course to prevent adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: