Background: Breast cancer is a major public health issue, but patient profiles from non-specialized, secondary-level hospitals, where most individuals first seek care, remain under-characterized. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive clinicopathological and sociodemographic characterization of breast cancer patients at a community hospital in Cali, Colombia, and to explore potential associations between socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of medical records from 96 patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Descriptive and inferential statistics — the Kruskal-Wallis test for Ki-67, and Fisher's exact test given small cell counts in some comparisons — were used to explore associations between molecular subtype, age, socioeconomic status, and stage at diagnosis. Results: The cohort was predominantly postmenopausal (median age, 60 years), urban (90.6%), and diagnosed with ductal carcinoma (92.7% of all cases overall; 87.5% specifically infiltrating — see audit note in section 3.2). The molecular landscape was dominated by hormone receptor-positive disease: Luminal A (44.8%), Luminal B (38.5%, including a HER2-positive subset accounting for 10.4% of the whole cohort), and triple-negative (16.7%); no case met criteria for HER2-positive non-luminal disease. Triple-negative disease was numerically more prevalent among women under 50 years (21.1%) than among those 50 and older (15.6%), without a statistically significant difference. Stage at diagnosis did not differ significantly by health insurance regimen, although this comparison was limited by a contributory/private group of only 3 patients (Fisher's exact p = 1.00; prevalence ratio for advanced-stage diagnosis, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.16-4.14). Conclusions: This secondary-level hospital manages a breast cancer caseload dominated by hormone receptor-positive disease, with a relevant burden of triple-negative tumors. The exploratory comparison between socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis could not be conclusively evaluated given the extremely small contributory/private group; these findings support the need to strengthen diagnostic and referral pathways at community hospitals and warrant larger, adequately powered studies to further investigate potential health disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cañas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: