Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Galaxy size, as defined as the radius at which the stellar surface density reaches 1~M_\,pc⁻² (R₁), has been shown to correlate more tightly with stellar mass than the effective radius. Cosmological simulations further predict a tight relation between R₁ and dark matter halo mass (M₂₀₀), but this prediction has not yet been tested observationally. We present the first observational test of the predicted R₁--M₂₀₀ relation and assess whether galaxy size, defined through R₁, can serve as a robust estimator of dark matter halo mass. We analyze galaxies from the SPARC database, combining high-quality rotation curves to infer dark matter halo masses with stellar surface density profiles derived from photometric data to measure R₁. We then compare the observed relation with the predictions from state-of-the-art cosmological simulations. We find good agreement between observations and simulations: galaxies follow the same tight R₁--M₂₀₀ relation predicted by numerical models across the explored mass range, with low intrinsic scatter. We provide the first observational validation of the R₁--M₂₀₀ relation, demonstrating that R₁ is a simple, physically motivated, and robust estimator of dark matter halo mass. Because R₁ is determined entirely from photometric observations, it provides a tool for inferring halo masses from imaging data alone, with applications to studies of galaxy formation and evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brook et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: