Short-video platforms have made tri-modal production—moving images, voice, and on-screen text—the default grammar of digital communication, yet much of this content suffers from a paradox we call modality surplus with semantic deficit: channels multiply while meanings drift apart. Drawing on multimodal discourse analysis and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, this study conceptualizes multimodal semantic understanding (MSU) not merely as a recognition technique but as a measurable production resource, and asks whether semantic alignment across modalities improves communication outcomes. We constructed a Multimodal Semantic Consistency Index (MSCI) with a CLIP-style audio-visual-text alignment pipeline and applied it to a stratified sample of 600 Douyin videos across six content categories. Communication effectiveness was measured as a composite of completion rate, likes, comments, and shares. Hierarchical regression shows that semantic consistency is the strongest single predictor of effectiveness (β = 0.243, p < .001), raising explained variance by 23.8 percentage points over account- and format-level controls; the effect is significantly amplified in knowledge-intensive categories (β = 0.083, p < .001), and tri-modal production pays off only when consistency is high. The findings reframe platform-era communication as a problem of cross-modal meaning governance, and yield concrete strategies for creators, MCNs, and platform governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: