Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let n≥2≥2k≥6 and n>k+. We determine the maximum of | A|| B| over all nonempty, nontrivial cross-intersecting families A⊆[n]k and B⊆[n]. The exact bound is | A|| B|≤max₁,M₂\, where \[ {aligned} M_1 &=({n-1}{k-1}-{n--1}{k-1}+1) ({n-1}{-1}-{n-k-1}{-1}+1),\\ M_2 &=({n-2}{-2}+1) ∑ᵢ₌₁² ({n-i}{k-1}-{n--i}{k-1}). {aligned} \] Both terms are attained by explicit constructions: a Hilton--Milner-type pair and a two-point construction, respectively. We classify all equality cases, including the additional cross-triangle pairs when k==3. Two structural results underlie the proof. First, we establish a restricted-lex comparison theorem showing that restricted lexicographic initial segments minimize disjointness neighborhoods, and characterize equality at the first nontrivial threshold. Second, a decomposition of critically shifted families into two parts with disjoint cores leads to a sharp product theorem, with equality characterized, for all cross-intersecting pairs admitting this decomposition, without additional nontriviality assumptions. Endpoint comparisons and reverse shifting complete the proof for unequal as well as equal uniformities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: