Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing scholarship has examined the Niger Delta largely through historicist, sociological, political, and ecocritical perspectives, while little attention has been given to the Marxist structures of power and counter-power. This study therefore examines the construction of power and counter-power in Ibiwari Ikiriko’s Oily Tears of the Delta and Nnimmo Bassey’s We Thought It Was Oil But It Was Blood, with a view to justifying the motifs of defiance and counteraction in the selected texts. Adopting Marxist literary theory, particularly the concepts of base and superstructure, hegemony, class exploitation and collective resistance, the study employs qualitative methodology and close comparative reading of two purposively selected poetry collections. Findings reveal that both Ikiriko and Bassey represent the Niger Delta as a site of class exploitation in which the Nigerian state, multinational oil corporations and elements of the regional political class benefit from the resources of the region while her people experience dispossession and deprivation. The poets employ different rhetorical strategies: Ikiriko foregrounds open defiance through direct accusation, exhortation and collective vows, while Bassey constructs counteraction through memory, interrogation and deliberation over the ethics of resistance. Despite these differences, both poets ultimately privilege collective solidarity and withdrawal of consent over armed confrontation. The study concludes that Niger Delta poetry functions not merely as a record of grievance but as an active literary site for contesting hegemonic power and imagining collective counter-power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: