What Social Factors Influence the Durability and Functionality of Community Flood Groups?

With flood risk increasing in many places worldwide, it is vital to develop solutions to mitigate flooding impacts and increase local flood resilience. The creation of Community Flood Groups (CFGs—grassroot community groups who provide representation for previously flooded communities) is one such avenue. Whilst these grassroot groups can coordinate local mutual aid and support in response to flooding events and provide a political voice to reduce flood impacts for some of the most current flood‐prone communities, they can be precarious in their longevity and functionality. The aim of this paper is to provide an initial analysis of the social and institutional factors that influence the durability and functionality of CFGs. A questionnaire was distributed to all CFG members in England and Wales to gather first‐hand opinions on the operation of CFGs. Data analysis identified 50 factors felt to influence the durability and functionality of CFGs. These were split into 6 main groupings (Collaboration and wider outreach, Relationships with Key Flood Actors, Group management and working, Membership dynamics, Knowledge and education, and External Factors). Results highlight that clear communication and collaboration are vital to the success of CFGs; however, these activities are complex, with CFGs having to manage relationships with many different actors including community members, independent facilitators and institutional representatives. The dynamics of group membership can also cause continuity and longevity issues.