An exponential random graph is a Gibbs measure on the graphs with n labeled vertices. Its Hamiltonian is n² times a linear combination of the homomorphism densities of chosen finite graphs, one of which is the graph K₂ with one edge. The coefficients of the combination are the parameters of the model. The GHS inequality, which Griffiths, Hurst and Sherman proved for Ising ferromagnets with pair interactions in a nonnegative field, states for an exponential random graph that the third joint cumulant of any three edge indicators is nonpositive. Bianchi, Collet and Magnanini proved the GHS inequality in a region of the parameters of the two-star model, whose chosen graphs are K₂ and a path with two edges. For a general exponential random graph whose parameters other than that of K₂ are nonnegative, they showed that the inequality fails when the probability of an edge, which is the same for all edges, is below $1/2$, and conjectured that it holds whenever that probability is at least $1/2$. We show that, whenever a chosen graph H has at least three edges, the conjecture fails even when every chosen graph other than K₂ and H has parameter 0. When the chosen graphs are K₂ and H, and n is at least the number of vertices of H, the probability of an edge is at least $1/2$ at every nonnegative parameter of K₂ and every positive parameter of H, whereas the inequality fails at every nonnegative parameter of K₂ when the parameter of H is positive and below a bound that depends on n and on the parameter of K₂. There is also an explicit bound, which does not depend on n, such that, at every positive parameter of H below it, the inequality fails for every large n at some parameter of K₂ at which the probability of an edge exceeds $1/2$. When every chosen graph has at most two edges and the parameters other than that of K₂ are nonnegative, the model is an Ising ferromagnet with pair interactions in a uniform field that is nonnegative exactly when the probability of an edge is at least $1/2$, so the conjecture holds by the inequality of Griffiths, Hurst and Sherman. For the two-star model with a nonnegative parameter of the path, that field is a linear function of the two parameters, so the GHS inequality holds exactly on one side of an explicit line.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sungwoo Kang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: