Addressing climate change has become a core priority for public authorities across all levels of governance and a primary criterion for economic decision-making. Unlike traditional policies, which usually last for a few years, public governance sets up long-term strategic directions that require states to make a lasting commitment to reach their goals over decades. The present study examines how public governance quality influences the financial severity of climate-related shocks. Using panel data for 24 European Union countries, over the period 2009–2024, we test whether stronger institutions and adaptive capacity are associated with lower climate-induced economic losses. The analysis employs a fixed-effects panel regression with robust standard errors, guided by a Hausman test that indicates significant country-specific effects. We find that higher public sector integrity (measured by a higher Corruption Perceptions Index score) is significantly associated with reduced climate-related economic losses. In contrast, an index of national climate adaptive capacity exhibits the expected negative coefficient, but is statistically insignificant, possibly due to sample homogeneity and short-run data limitations. Control variables suggest that more developed economies suffer greater absolute losses, while environmental taxation levels show no significant short-term effect on loss mitigation. Our findings highlight the importance of good governance and institutional quality as crucial components of climate risk management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dornean et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: