Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
**Objectives:** To describe trends in Bulgaria's routinely reported healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) during 2003–2024 and compare them descriptively with findings from three European point-prevalence surveys (PPS). **Methods:** We conducted a retrospective descriptive study using aggregate national data. The annual routine indicator, defined as recorded HAI episodes per 100 hospital discharges, was summarised descriptively and modelled by ordinary least-squares regression with year coded 0–21. A sensitivity analysis excluded 2020–2021. Published PPS estimates and confidence intervals were reproduced; no inferential test compared PPS prevalence with the routine indicator because the measures have different designs and denominators. **Results:** The mean routinely reported HAI rate was 0.97 per 100 hospital discharges. It decreased from 1.48 in 2003 to 0.64 in 2024; the fitted average change was −0.0354 percentage points per year (R²=0.883) and was similar after excluding 2020–2021 (−0.0373; R²=0.898). In contrast, primary national PPS prevalence estimates were 3.7% (95% CI 2.8–5.0), 3.5% (1.7–6.8), and 3.7% (2.3–6.0). The PPS surveys included 42, 12, and 23 Bulgarian hospitals, with ECDC representativeness classified as optimal, poor, and medium, respectively. **Conclusions:** The two surveillance approaches produced discordant but non-interchangeable patterns. The discordance alone does not prove under-ascertainment, but it does warrant evaluation of case detection, reporting practices, sample composition, and changes in the surveillance system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: