Selective machine unlearning aims to suppress targeted information while preserving retained and general knowledge. We investigate valence-aware gradient memory within low-rank adaptation (LoRA), separating retention-supporting and forgetting-related directions. Earlier experiments used Gamma-scaled exponential moving averages rather than genuine fractional dynamics; we preserve that distinction and introduce a normalized finite-history Grünwald–Letnikov (GL) fractional-integral accumulator with algebraically decaying coefficients. The study progresses from synthetic transformer optimization and pretrained text classification to causal language model experiments, including a new controlled evaluation on TOFU Forget10 using Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct. A SciQ- and WikiText-regularized teacher reduces reference-answer NLL on original and paraphrased TOFU questions while exhibiting a small World Facts penalty in a separate audit. From this fixed teacher, four unlearning methods were compared for 120 updates over three random seeds. Dual GL yields the largest paraphrased forget-set NLL increase (2.169±0.331), exceeding dual EMA (1.964±0.250), but incurs greater retain-set (1.043±0.207 versus 0.914±0.147) and World Facts (1.333±0.645 versus 1.153±0.567) degradation. Exact paired sign-flip tests do not establish statistical significance (p=0.25 for GL versus EMA). The stronger suppression achieved with fractional memory is accompanied by greater disruption of retained and general factual knowledge, suggesting a shift in model behavior rather than more selective forgetting. Whether the targeted information becomes genuinely inaccessible rather than merely less likely to be reproduced remains unresolved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Бородулин et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: