Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning systems trained on untrusted data are vulnerable to data and backdoor poisoning attacks, in which an adversary corrupts training and test samples to manipulate predictions at inference time. Randomized smoothing yields provable defenses against such attacks, but existing applications to train-time robustness are limited to specific threat models and smoothing mechanisms. We propose a general framework that allows expressing complex adversary constraints on the number of corrupted training examples, feature and label perturbation magnitudes, and test-time corruptions. Our framework randomizes inputs by combining data subsampling with feature, label and test-sample noising. We develop a composable certification procedure based on f-divergences that handles arbitrary combinations of threat models and noising strategies, and recovers several prior certification regimes exactly as special cases. We demonstrate our framework experimentally by certifying, for the first time, robustness under general ₚ-constrained poisoning adversaries under bagging with additive Laplace, Gaussian, and Uniform noises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rose et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: