Background Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an interstitial pneumonitis caused by inhalation of various antigens, with primary treatment involving antigen avoidance. Typical computed tomography (CT) findings include diffuse ground-glass opacities, mosaic attenuation, and ill-defined centrilobular nodules. However, ground-glass opacities can also be seen in numerous other diseases, including alveolar hemorrhage, a life-threatening complication of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis that requires prompt intervention. We present a case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis exhibiting features of hypersensitivity pneumonitis that resembled alveolar hemorrhage. Case presentation This report describes the case of an 80-year-old Japanese male with stable granulomatosis with polyangiitis who developed hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The patient presented with a fever and general fatigue. A chest CT scan revealed multiple ground-glass opacities and a halo sign, which are often observed in alveolar hemorrhage or alveolitis associated with ANCA-associated vasculitis. However, physical examination and laboratory findings did not indicate relapse of granulomatosis with polyangiitis. We promptly performed bronchoalveolar lavage and excluded alveolar hemorrhage. A detailed history-taking revealed that the patient had been exposed to birds for the preceding 3 months and the patient was diagnosed with bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Prompt bronchoalveolar lavage and thorough history-taking are essential for accurate differentiation between hypersensitivity pneumonitis and alveolar hemorrhages when these imaging characteristics are observed. Conclusions This case demonstrates that hypersensitivity pneumonitis can present with ground-glass opacities and CT halo sign resembling alveolar hemorrhage. Prompt bronchoalveolar lavage and thorough history-taking are essential for accurate differentiation, preventing unnecessary immunosuppressive therapy escalation and ensuring appropriate antigen avoidance treatment. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: