Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Health literacy, physical activity, and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are increasingly recognized as important factors influencing coping strategies, quality of life, and well-being in cancer patients. However, empirical evidence on their interrelationships remains limited. Methods We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study between April and November 2024 at one Comprehensive Cancer Center and eleven oncological sites across Germany. A total of 316 cancer patients completed a standardized questionnaire assessing health literacy, self-reported sport participation, expectations toward physical activity, affective attitudes toward physical activity, CAM use, spirituality, nutrition, and life satisfaction. Descriptive statistics, reliability analyses, t-tests, and Spearman’s correlations were performed. Results Among the 316 participants, health literacy (M = 3.10, SD = 0.44) and life satisfaction (M = 7.03, SD = 2.02) were high. Health literacy did not differ significantly by self-reported pre-diagnosis sport participation. Life satisfaction likewise did not differ by self-reported pre-diagnosis sport participation. In contrast, more positive affective attitudes toward physical activity were significantly correlated with health-related expectations toward physical activity ( r = 0.580, p < 0.001), body-related motives ( r = 0.471, p < 0.001), and life satisfaction ( r = 0.212, p < 0.001). CAM use was frequent, with 44.9% reporting vitamin D supplementation and 37.5% other vitamins or dietary supplements. Conclusion While self-reported sport participation did not show significant associations with life satisfaction, motivational and cognitive factors—such as positive attitudes and expectations—were linked to health literacy and well-being. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening patient-centered communication, motivational counseling, and health literacy as key elements of integrative oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostendorf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: