Key result
Amyloidosis-suggestive echo reporting is linked to ~9.6-fold higher odds of downstream diagnostic testing.
Why the study?
Does inclusion of language suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis in transthoracic echocardiography reports increase downstream diagnostic testing for cardiac amyloidosis within 1 year in patients ≥65 years old with severely increased LV wall thickness?
Cohort (n=271)
No
Does inclusion of language suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis in transthoracic echocardiography reports increase downstream diagnostic testing for cardiac amyloidosis within 1 year in patients ≥65 years old with severely increased LV wall thickness?
Explicitly mentioning the possibility of cardiac amyloidosis in echocardiogram reports for older adults with severe LV wall thickening significantly increases the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing, addressing a major gap in underdiagnosis.
Report phrasing may influence diagnostic pursuit in suspected amyloidosis; hypothesis-generating for strategies to reduce underdiagnosis pending prospective validation.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Severely increased left ventricular wall thickness concerning for cardiac amyloidosis (n=271). Language suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis in TTE report vs. TTE report without language suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis was evaluated on Downstream diagnostic cardiac amyloidosis testing within 1 year of TTE (OR 9.6, 95% CI 3.3-28, p=<0.001). Language suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis in TTE reports increased downstream diagnostic testing within 1 year compared to reports without such language (38% vs 4%, OR 9.6, 95% CI 3.3-28, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: