Key result
Guideline imaging surveillance after type A dissection repair is linked to ~8% higher mortality.
Why the study?
Survivors of acute type A aortic dissection repair remain at risk for long-term complications, and real-world adherence to guideline-recommended postoperative imaging surveillance was uncertain.
Does adherence to guideline-directed imaging surveillance improve long-term all-cause mortality and reintervention rates in patients who survive urgent acute type A aortic dissection repair?
Cohort (n=888)
Yes
Does adherence to guideline-directed imaging surveillance improve long-term all-cause mortality and reintervention rates in patients who survive urgent acute type A aortic dissection repair?
Real-world adherence to guideline-directed imaging surveillance after acute type A aortic dissection repair is very poor (14%), while long-term risks of mortality and urgent reintervention remain high, suggesting a need to re-evaluate current surveillance guidelines.
Postoperative imaging after ATAAD repair occurs less frequently than recommended; leaves open whether higher adherence improves long-term outcomes.
Background Survivors of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remain at risk for long-term complications. Guidelines recommend postoperative imaging surveillance, but adherence is uncertain. Objectives The aim of this study was to define the real-world frequency of postoperative imaging and characterize long-term outcomes of ATAAD. Methods Population-based administrative health databases for Ontario, Canada, were linked to identify patients who underwent ATAAD repair and survived at least 90 days. Guideline-directed imaging surveillance (GDIS) was defined as undergoing a computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scan at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and then annually thereafter. Multivariable time-to-event analysis explored the associations between GDIS and all-cause mortality and reintervention. Results A total of 888 patients who survived urgent ATAAD repair between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2018, were included. Median follow-up after ATAAD repair was 5.2 years (interquartile range: 2.4-7.9 years). A total of 14% patients received GDIS throughout follow-up. At 6 years, 3.9% of patients had received GDIS. The mortality rate was 4% at 1 year, 14% at 5 years, and 29% at 10 years. Incidence of aortic reintervention was 3% at 1 year, 9% at 5 years, and 17% at 10 years; the majority of these were urgent (68%), and they carried a 9% 30-day mortality rate. Greater adherence to GDIS was associated with mortality (hazard ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.11) and reintervention (hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07). Conclusions Adherence to GDIS following ATAAD repair is poor, while long-term mortality and reinterventions remain substantial. Further research is needed to determine if guidelines should be modified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=888). Guideline-directed imaging surveillance (CT or MRI at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter) vs. Lower or non-adherence to guideline-directed imaging surveillance was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11). Guideline-directed imaging surveillance after acute type A aortic dissection repair had 14% adherence and was associated with mortality (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.11) and reintervention (HR 1.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: