Key result
Nurse-driven anti-Xa heparin protocol increases 24-hour therapeutic anticoagulation by ~26 percentage points over aPTT.
Why the study?
The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System introduced a nurse-driven anti-factor Xa protocol to replace its previous activated partial thromboplastin time protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin, and evaluated the efficacy of the new protocol.
Does a nurse-driven anti-factor Xa monitoring protocol improve the achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours compared to an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) protocol in hospitalized patients receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin?
Cohort (n=782)
No
Does a nurse-driven anti-factor Xa monitoring protocol improve the achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours compared to an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) protocol in hospitalized patients receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin?
Transitioning from an aPTT-based to a nurse-driven anti-Xa monitoring protocol for intravenous unfractionated heparin significantly increases the proportion of patients reaching therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours while reducing blood draws, dose adjustments, and nursing calculation errors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nurse-driven anti-Xa monitoring was associated with faster therapeutic anticoagulation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System introduced a new nurse-driven anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin to replace the previous activated partial thromboplastin time protocol. OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of the anti-Xa monitoring protocol. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team of providers collaborated to develop and implement a nurse-driven, facility-wide anti-factor Xa protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. The effectiveness of this protocol was evaluated by retrospective analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 100 medical records for compliance with the new anti-Xa monitoring protocol. We then evaluated 178 patients whose anticoagulation was monitored with the anti-Xa assay to determine the time to therapeutic range. We found that 80% of patients receiving the anti-Xa protocol achieved therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours, as compared with 54% of patients receiving the activated partial thromboplastin time protocol (P < .001). Protocol conversion also yielded a decrease in blood draws, dose adjustments, and potential calculation errors. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring intravenous heparin therapy with the anti-Xa assay rather than activated partial thromboplastin time resulted in a shorter time to therapeutic anticoagulation, longer maintenance of therapeutic levels, and fewer laboratory tests and heparin dosage changes. We believe the current practice of monitoring heparin treatment with activated partial thromboplastin time assays should be reexamined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams-Norwood et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Hospitalized patients receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin anticoagulation (n=782). Nurse-driven anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) heparin monitoring protocol vs. Nurse-driven activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) heparin monitoring protocol was evaluated on Achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours (p=<0.001). The nurse-driven anti-Xa heparin monitoring protocol increased the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours to 80% compared with 54% using the aPTT protocol (P < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: