Key result
Braided nitinol filters retrieve similar embolic debris loads and particle sizes as GuardWire balloons during SVG stenting.
Why the study?
The number, size, and volume of plaque particulate debris released during saphenous vein graft stenting had not been quantified, leaving embolic protection approaches empiric.
Does a braided nitinol vascular filter retrieve similar volumes and sizes of particulate debris compared to an occlusion balloon (PercuSurge GuardWire) in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting?
Observational (n=60)
Does a braided nitinol vascular filter retrieve similar volumes and sizes of particulate debris compared to an occlusion balloon (PercuSurge GuardWire) in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft stenting?
Vascular filtering devices and occlusion balloons retrieve identical volumes and size distributions of particulate debris during saphenous vein graft stenting, suggesting similar potential clinical efficacy in preventing distal particulate embolization.
Novel debris quantification in SVG stenting may guide protection device selection; leaves open efficacy in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Distal embolization of plaque particulate liberated during stenting may cause periprocedural complications. The number, size, and volume of debris released during stenting, however, have not been quantified, rendering embolic protection approaches empiric. We used a novel method of microparticle size assessment to measure volume and characterize individual sizes of particles captured by the PercuSurge GuardWire balloon or a vascular filter during saphenous vein graft stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Braided nitinol filters (average distal pore size 100 microns) were used in 47 saphenous vein grafts in 44 patients. The PercuSurge GuardWire was used in 17 saphenous vein grafts in 16 patients. Particulate debris was subjected to microparticle size analysis (RapidVue, Beckman Coulter). All samples contained particulate debris. For both filter and GuardWire populations, most particles were <100 microm in longest dimension (87% and 90% of particles, respectively), and the distribution of particle sizes was identical. Total embolic load per lesion for both filters and GuardWire aspirates was also similar: median embolic load per filter was 16 mm3 (range 2 to 84 mm3). Median embolic load per GuardWire was also 16 mm3 (range 7 to 42 mm3). Histopathologic analysis demonstrated that most samples contained plaque elements and platelet-rich thrombus. CONCLUSIONS: During saphenous vein graft interventions, particulate retrieved with a vascular filtering device or an occlusion balloon was similar in amount and character. This supports the notion that unless soluble mediators play an important role in adverse acute clinical events after stenting, the clinical efficacy of filtering devices may be equal to that of occlusion devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Saphenous vein graft disease undergoing stenting (n=60). Braided nitinol vascular filter (100-micron average distal pore size) vs. PercuSurge GuardWire occlusion balloon was evaluated on Median embolic load per lesion (mm3) and proportion of particles <100 microm. Braided nitinol filters and PercuSurge GuardWire occlusion balloons retrieved identical median embolic loads (16 mm3 vs 16 mm3) and similar proportions of particles <100 microm (87% vs 90%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: