HD 158485 is an A-type δ Scuti star in the CALSPEC network and the JWST absolute-flux calibration program. Gaia DR3 assigns it a binary classification probability close to unity but provides no orbital solution. Using TESS observations from Sectors 14–26, 40–41, 47–60, and 73–86, we measure the pulsation phases of six δ Scuti modes. The frequencies form two groups with opposite light-travel-time delays, revealing two pulsating components. A direct light-curve forward model yields an orbital period of P orb = 382.8 0 − 0.76 + 0.80 days, eccentricity e = 0.24 2 − 0.046 + 0.045 , projected light-time amplitudes of 195 . 8 − 8.9 + 9.2 and 239 . 7 − 6.8 + 6.8 s, and a dynamical mass ratio of q = M B / M A = 0.81 8 − 0.045 + 0.046 . A blind prediction based only on the first two long TESS campaigns reproduces the third campaign without updating the orbital parameters, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.983. Its held-out rms is 83.8 s, compared with 289.9 s when the period is fixed at 365.25 days. A 5.15 σ Hipparcos–Gaia EDR3 proper-motion anomaly independently indicates unresolved astrometric motion. The unresolved companion can also affect spectrophotometric predictions: a conditional double-pulsator-binary (PB2)-constrained two-atmosphere model differs from the corresponding single-star atmosphere prediction by 1.6% over 1–5 μ m and 2.5% over 5–28 μ m. HD 158485 therefore shows that a calibration-relevant binary can lack a catalogued orbital solution while two independent pulsation clocks reveal and measure its orbit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: