Kraft lignin-derived carbons are promising catalytic supports for wastewater treatment, but increasing surface area does not necessarily improve metal retention or substrate-dependent oxidation performance. Here, raw and KOH-activated lignin-derived supports with distinct pore structures were loaded with the same nominal Ni content and evaluated for adsorption-assisted H₂O₂ oxidation of dye-containing water. Carbonization and activation increased the BET surface area from 1.2 m² g⁻¹ for raw lignin to 192.0, 1140.8, and 1504.5 m² g⁻¹ for CLow, CMid, and CHigh, respectively. However, CMid-Ni showed the highest actual Ni loading (4.83 wt%; 96.6% retention), whereas CHigh-Ni retained 4.58 wt% Ni (91.6%). Methylene blue (MB) and Congo red (CR) represented dyes with contrasting charge and molecular structure. At pH 4, CHigh-Ni showed the highest MB oxidation rate ( k app = 0.2154 min⁻¹), whereas CMid-Ni showed the highest CR oxidation rate ( k app = 0.1237 min⁻¹). Carbon-only controls showed measurable apparent dye disappearance after H₂O₂ addition, whereas Ni loading enhanced the apparent rates by 3.16–6.73-fold. In a synthetic textile wastewater matrix containing both dyes and salts, the same numerical ranking was retained, although the CR rate difference between CMid-Ni and CHigh-Ni decreased. H₂O₂ consumption, dissolved-phase TOC reduction, scavenger inhibition, and filtrate tests were consistent with an adsorption-assisted, predominantly surface-associated Ni-mediated oxidation process. Single-run Ni leaching remained below 1%, while cumulative Ni loss after five reuse cycles was 1.51%. These results show that lignin-derived Ni/carbon catalysts should be optimized by balancing pore accessibility, metal retention, and oxidant activation rather than by maximizing BET surface area alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: