The increasing volume of global maritime traffic requires the safe navigation of large vessels through restricted waterways, where ship-bank interactions can increase the risks of grounding, collision, and channel blockage. This review critically evaluates experimental, numerical, and simulation-based studies of ship-bank hydrodynamic interactions. The analysis shows that CFD generally provides more accurate predictions of surge and sway forces by capturing viscous and free-surface effects, particularly in shallow water, although considerable uncertainty remains in predicting yaw moments near banks under extremely shallow-water conditions. Potential-flow methods enable rapid parametric assessments but may underpredict lateral forces because of their inviscid formulation. Major research gaps include limited experimental uncertainty quantification, insufficient investigation of multi-degree-of-freedom drift motions, and conflicting surge-force trends associated with hull-specific flow dynamics. Future research should prioritize hybrid experimental-numerical frameworks, scale-effect quantification, and validated multi-DOF mathematical models incorporating external disturbances to enhance navigational safety.Highlights Review ship-bank interaction experimental and numerical studies.Comparative analysis of studies based on previous approaches.Displaying the differences across various conducted studies.Highlight the scientific issues that require more concern in future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherif et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: