One important mission of science education is to create a highly educated and skilled STEM workforce, yet in China as in many Western countries, universities often struggle to attract and retain students in science programmes. Selecting and persisting in a science major typically involves coursework across multiple science domains such as physics, chemistry and biology. Therefore, it is important to understand students’ discipline-specific motivational perceptions. The purpose of this study was to examine Chinese high school students’ motivational profiles (i.e. self-efficacy beliefs, perceived values and costs) across three science domains and how the profile membership related to their future educational and career aspirations. Latent profile analysis identified four profiles: low group (i.e. low self-efficacy, low value, moderately low cost), moderate all group (i.e. moderate self-efficacy, moderate value, moderate cost), moderately high group (i.e. moderate self-efficacy, moderately high value, moderately high cost) and high efficacy/low cost group (i.e. moderately high self-efficacy, moderate value, low cost). The profile membership was differentially related to students’ exam choices and major/career choices across three science domains. Findings of this study contribute to understanding the influence of motivational beliefs on students’ choice behaviours and suggest implications for future instructional interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: