The effects and damages caused by disasters generate significant public outcry, which can motivate mobilisation and social participation within affected communities. This study examines social participation and public oversight in sanitation within the context of reparations for the Brumadinho disaster, emphasising the involvement of the affected communities. It analyses the prospects for such participation in repairing the damages from the failure of the Córrego do Feijão dam, operated by Vale S.A. A qualitative research methodology was employed, involving the collection of official documents such as agreements, meeting minutes, and other records related to the State Policy for People Affected by Dams. Furthermore, interviews were conducted with social actors involved in the reparation process. The results reveal significant gaps in methods for social participation and oversight in sanitation. These gaps hinder the inclusion of affected populations in decision-making processes, a situation that conflicts with the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation and the Sustainable Development Goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: