Localised heating in stored barley can remain undetected when temperature measurements are spatially sparse.This study combines a small-scale experiment and computational fluid dynamics to assess heat propagation from a controlled hotspot and its implications for temperature monitoring.A transient three-dimensional porous-medium model with coupled heat and moisture transfer was developed in Ansys Fluent and compared with measurements from a geometrically similar 1:20 silo tube testbench.A heated copper sphere, 60 mm in diameter, represented a localised thermal source; biological heat generation was not modelled explicitly.The reported average standard error was 0.58°C, the maximum standard error was 0.96°C, and the maximum absolute prediction error was 1.26°C.Two prescribed hotspot temperatures, 38°C and 45°C, were investigated over 14 days.The corresponding 1°C temperaturerise contours travelled 456 mm and 531 mm, respectively, with propagation slowing over time.The higher source temperature increased the reported 14-day distance by 75 mm, or approximately 16%.These results illustrate the limited spatial reach of a local temperature disturbance under the investigated conditions and support assessment of sensor location when interpreting silo temperature records.However, a 1 °C contour does not establish a reliable detection radius, particularly given the stated ±1°C thermocouple accuracy.Numerical sensitivity, measurement uncertainty and full-scale boundary effects require further assessment before the results can define industrial sensor spacing or detection times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zyl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: