Despite substantial investments in electronic resources, academic libraries face a persistent cognitive gap: users struggle to discover and effectively use subscribed databases. This study argues that inadequate database description pages constitute a critical yet underexamined barrier. Integrating Information Quality and Knowledge Organization theories, we construct a three-dimensional framework and apply it to evaluate description pages across 42 leading Chinese academic libraries. Results reveal systematic deficiencies: descriptions rely on promotional language lacking objectivity; pages function as information silos with minimal links to help services or related resources; and maintenance metadata is largely absent, compromising timeliness. These flaws violate core information quality principles and directly widen the cognitive gap. The study advocates a user-centered shift from static lists to dynamic knowledge networks and from isolated pages to collaboratively maintained service hubs. It offers both a reusable assessment framework and actionable recommendations for transforming description pages into effective cognitive bridges that enhance resource discovery and support scholarly workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: