Corporate fraud is a serious threat to the integrity of markets, the protection of investors, and public confidence in business institutions. It may involve the deliberate falsification of accounts, diversion of assets, bribery, market manipulation, concealment of liabilities, related-party abuse, or misleading disclosures. In India, the problem is addressed through a combination of company law, securities regulation, financial-sector supervision, criminal investigation, audit regulation and corporate-governance requirements. The framework includes the Companies Act, 2013; the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; listing and disclosure regulations; banking laws; and the work of institutions such as the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Serious Fraud Investigation Office, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Reserve Bank of India, National Financial Reporting Authority and enforcement agencies. This paper examines the principal forms and causes of corporate fraud, the legal and institutional mechanisms used to prevent and investigate it, and the continuing challenges in enforcement. The Satyam Computer Services scandal and the Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services crisis are considered as examples of how weak oversight, misleading financial information, governance failures and delayed detection can damage stakeholders. The paper argues that India has developed a substantial formal framework, but effective protection depends on implementation: timely information sharing, competent investigation, independent boards and auditors, credible whistle-blower systems, proportionate sanctions, and stronger financial literacy. It concludes that regulation should combine deterrence with early detection and organisational cultures that reward truthful reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shreya Aggarwal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: