We provide a general framework to analyze competition between oligopolistic platforms in competitive bottleneck settings, allowing for pricing and nonprice design choices by platforms, and post-participation buyer-seller decisions. We show that equilibrium choices by platforms are distorted against sellers’ interests in a way harmful to welfare (e.g., setting excessive commission fees), and that an increase in the number of competing platforms can exacerbate this distortion. We also characterize how buyer-side heterogeneity in interaction benefits, partial market coverage, platform asymmetry, and cross-platform spillovers further amplify or mitigate welfare distortions. Based on our findings, we discuss policy implications for mobile app platforms. (JEL D43, L13, L25, L96)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: